Two weeks in progress!
Hello everybody,
it’s our turn, so we’ve just organized a “sub-network” with all the people that took part in our proposal two years ago; they all were students, but now most of them are already architects. So our work will be done by Lleyda-delaPeña & Gordo-Farina-Aragon-dePaz-Anton-DiazChyla-Conradi-Bazo.
Congratulations for all your work, we find all comments quite interesting.
-To be practical, we are working with Anette, Julie and Trine proposal. Janne’s “7 brothers” is also good, and we understand his interest to cross Flegmade with those North-South lanes, but we agree Henrik’s wish to keep the area as a more compact space and to enrich Flegmade with urban highlights. Anyway, 3d images are really amazing and compatible with both projects.
-So now Morten and Ramon&Celia are working on 3d studies. Don’t you think it would be better to wait until we send our work in two weeks? Perhaps we introduce some components that should be considered in the images. Or maybe you should go on as part of the process and final images should be done with the definitive results…
-Although we’re working to define Flegmade, we’ve found in our first meeting three matters that could improve the general plan:
1-Creating a ring lane (as in “7 brothers”)could be fine, and it’s very easy to arrange; the south-north lane should end in another lane to work properly.
2-We’re very worried about the symmetry that has been generated at Boulevarden. It reminds pre-war design and we find it a little unnatural.
3-Is there any reason to handle with so many “L shaped” buildings? Could buildings along Flegmade, for instance, take a more linear shape? Besides, we think the relation between new buildings and the podium in Janne’s proposal should be recovered for the section.
Up with ICE!
Regards,
Antonio and Eduardo

